NASA Looking For Origin Of Universe
NASA Looking For Origin Of Universe
By Bill Range (Senior Research Associate FineTunedUniverse.com)
Today July 13, 2015 NASA scientists are very excited about the spacecraft that is flying by pluto. In a news conference one of them said, "NASA is looking for the origin of the solar system".
In other words scientists who believe in the "big bang theory" hope to find some evidence to support their theory. If the evidence does not support their theory of self creation from nothing as their origin, the scientists will find or invent ways to explain why the evidence found does not fit the "big bang theory" mold.
This is what they must do, because they don't believe in a creator and must at all costs deny his existance. Their world view belief system will not allow them to think GOD created the heavens/earth. They are determined to in effect believe they are self created from nothing by chance.
It is a startling contrast when you think of how precise their scientic instruments and measurements must be to explore the solar system. Oh how they want to prove they are self sufficent and need no God or Creator! Seeking evidence to prove the "big bang theory" while relying on the "laws of nature" with no explanation for their origin.
What are the laws of nature? Scientists who search for the origin of the universe and believe it is a cosmic coincidence use the "laws of nature" as the "principles" which govern the natural phenomena of the world. They just accept the "laws of nature" as fact and believe their existance was set in motion by chance. Those who search for the origins of the universe rely on these constants to do their research.
Those who deny God never search for the answers as to why the "constants of nature" exist or their origin.
Scientists use planetary physics, constants, to guide the New Horizons spacecraft through the Pluto system.
Several years ago, Carl Sagan declared his full confidence in the Big Bang theory and its billions of years, but he admitted to one major problem. He couldn’t understand where the laws of nature came from. He realized that his view of origins depended upon the laws of nature being present first. Yet he had no explanation for their origin because he didn’t believe in God. Scripture provides the reason why he had this problem: “But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him” Hebrews 11:6).
Conclusion
Sadly, secular scientists who have the best seat in the house to observe God’s handiwork through a microscope or a telescope/spacecraft often seem to be the first to deny that He is the Creator. Because they deny He is Creator, they fail to grasp the ultimate explanation for the world around us. Their world view does not allow the existance of God.
Scripture says it best: “For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse” (Romans 1:20).
Here is a recent example of a secular scientist trying to explain Pluto’s moons’ orbital configuration created by God.
Chaotic interactions between moons and their orbitees are uncommon, but not unknown, says Showalter, of the SETI Institute in Mountain View, Calif. Saturn’s cratered, potato-shaped moon Hyperion also has a wobbly rotation, one that is impossible to forecast in advance, unlike the majority of well-behaved, synchronously rotating moons in the solar system.
More curious than that, however, may be Pluto’s moons’ orbital configuration. The ratios of their orbital periods (the amount of time they take to complete their orbit around the Pluto-Charon pair) are very close to 1:3:4:5:6. That simple integer ratio is called the Laplace resonance—a gravitational relationship seen in Jupiter’s moons Io, Europa, and Ganymede, which have a period ratio of 1:2:4.
Aside from being mathematically cool, the Laplace-like resonances seen around Pluto narrows down some of the possibilities for how the system formed. In the past, the relationships between the moons’ movements may have been more perfectly aligned, until they were knocked slightly out of place by some unknown force, speculates Scott Kenyon, an astrophysicist at the Smithsonian and author of an accompanying Nature article commenting on Showalter and Hamilton’s study. The probability that this relationship developed by chance, he says, is very slight (about 1 percent).
(Here an astrophysicist admits the moons orbiting around pluto did not happen by chance. The laplace resonances of pluto's moons refute the inclusion of pluto or its moons into the big bang theory equation mold. Again as in the past not one of the moons or planets in our solar system fit the "big bang model.
As NASA research continues for the origin or the solar system and universe, the big bang theory does not equate or compute. When valid observations of the solar system are plugged into the big bang therory the results don't not add up because they don't equal the billions of years part of the theory. So those who deny a creator must invent ver 8,9,10,11 etc of the big big theory to make sure it always points to billions of evolution years.
The theory is modified to include data that has not been observed or scientifically proven. Examples are the "Oort Cloud," "dark matter" or "dark energy" etc.
The big bang theory is always on the back burner cooking and from time to time secular scientists add "artificial ingredients" to the "big bang stew" for your consumption because the "stew" of the big bang theory deception needs tweaking to keep it from going rancid and alerting the consumer as to what it really contains! Think of these artificial ingredients as "data" in a form similar to MSG which tricks the human brain into believing what they are consuming tastes better that it really does.
Secular scientists modify, tweak and revise the big bang theory to make it fit for human consumption. It evolves constantly yet is claimed to be the cornerstone of the origin of the universe.The secular scientist/atheist is constantly modifying his world view via the big bang theory to deny that God is the Creator of the universe.
Pluto and its moons were not created by chance they were created by God as he says in,
Gen 1:1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.)
Kerberos, the most recently discovered member of the Pluto-moon family, continues to add to the system’s mystery. Observations suggest that its mass is about one third of the mass of Nix and Hydra. Yet it reflects so little sunlight (about 5 percent as much as Nix and Hydra) that it is probably made of a different material.“We expect it is about as black as coal,” says Showalter.
(Where did the different material come from? Their standard answer is a "loose cannon" astroid every time.)
"Secular scientists are hoping that data collected by New Horizons will enable them to tell a story about how the solar system came into existence. And although they do not say so explicitly (perhaps they don't wish to offend the American taxpayers who provide NASA's funding), there is little doubt they fully intend for this story to leave no room for a supernatural Creator."
New Horizons, Pluto, and the Age of the Solar System