Listen to Creation Talk Episodes
Creation Talk Episode 1
(Evolution Theory "Magic Mix" Explanation Of Creation)
(What experiment has determined that evolution deserves the credit for constructing everything? You could substitute the word "magic" in place of "evolution" to further reveal the complete lack of science behind evolution theories that always include a timeline of millions of years to compensate for the atheist explanation of "natural selection".
How does natural selection explain goo-to-you evolution? Evolution does not explain the origin of the diversity of life. It adds millions of years to explanations to compensate for the "black hole" of evolution theories.
Evolution does not explain where the genes and creatures came from in the first place.
Evolution does not explain the origin of the traits that make an organism adapted to an environment.
Evolution theories leave that part up to you to figure out with your imagination via the millions of years timeline.
The "magic" of millions of years and millions of accidental "natural selections" or goo-to-you evolution is held out as an explantion of creation.
I recently read an article, Spine Signals Ears to Maintain Balance, that was about how the body compensates for locomotion by anticipating the effects and dampens the inner ear cells sensitivity by sending a signal from the spinal chord to the inner ear before another signal is sent to the muscles.
The article concluded that evolution had come up with an elegant means of anticipation effects of locomotion of the body and compensating for them in an adaptive fashion.
Evolution via natural selection is not elegant because according to an atheist it would have taken millions of years to accomplish the result.
Elegant design is how the body compensates for locomotion by anticipating the effects of movements.
The elegant design of creation by God did not take millions of years but only 6 days.) Researcher Bill Rains
15 Questions For Evolutionists (Creation.com)
1 How did life originate? Evolutionist Professor Paul Davies admitted, “Nobody knows how a mixture of lifeless chemicals spontaneously organized themselves into the first living cell.” Andrew Knoll, professor of biology, Harvard, said, “we don’t really know how life originated on this planet”. A minimal cell needs several hundred proteins. Even if every atom in the universe were an experiment with all the correct amino acids present for every possible molecular vibration in the supposed evolutionary age of the universe, not even one average-sized functional protein would form. So how did life with hundreds of proteins originate just by chemistry without intelligent design?
2 How did the DNA code originate? The code is a sophisticated language system with letters and words where the meaning of the words is unrelated to the chemical properties of the letters—just as the information on this page is not a product of the chemical properties of the ink (or pixels on a screen). What other coding system has existed without intelligent design? How did the DNA coding system arise without it being created?
3 How could mutations—accidental copying mistakes (DNA ‘letters’ exchanged, deleted or added, genes duplicated, chromosome inversions, etc.)—create the huge volumes of information in the DNA of living things? How could such errors create 3 billion letters of DNA information to change a microbe into a microbiologist? There is information for how to make proteins but also for controlling their use—much like a cookbook contains the ingredients as well as the instructions for how and when to use them. One without the other is useless.
Mutations are known for their destructive effects, including over 1,000 human diseases such as hemophilia. Rarely are they even helpful. But how can scrambling existing DNA information create a new biochemical pathway or nano-machines with many components, to make ‘goo-to-you’ evolution possible? E.g., How did a 32-component rotary motor like ATP synthase (which produces the energy currency, ATP, for all life), or robots like kinesin (a ‘postman’ delivering parcels inside cells) originate?
4 Why is natural selection, a principle recognized by creationists, taught as ‘evolution’, as if it explains the origin of the diversity of life? By definition it is a selective process (selecting from already existing information), so is not a creative process. It might explain the survival of the fittest (why certain genes benefit creatures more in certain environments), but not the arrival of the fittest (where the genes and creatures came from in the first place). The death of individuals not adapted to an environment and the survival of those that are suited does not explain the origin of the traits that make an organism adapted to an environment. E.g., how do minor back-and-forth variations in finch beaks explain the origin of beaks or finches? How does natural selection explain goo-to-you evolution?
5 How did new biochemical pathways, which involve multiple enzymes working together in sequence, originate? Every pathway and nano-machine requires multiple protein/enzyme components to work. How did lucky accidents create even one of the components, let alone 10 or 20 or 30 at the same time, often in a necessary programmed sequence.
Evolutionary biochemist Franklin Harold wrote, “we must concede that there are presently no detailed Darwinian accounts of the evolution of any biochemical or cellular system, only a variety of wishful speculations.”
6 Dawkins wrote, “biology is the study of complicated things that have the appearance of having been designed with a purpose.” Francis Crick, the co-discoverer of the double helix structure of DNA, wrote, “Biologists must constantly keep in mind that what they see was not designed, but rather evolved.” The problem for evolutionists is that living things show too much design. Who objects when an archaeologist says that pottery points to human design? Yet if someone attributes the design in living things to a designer, that is not acceptable. Why should science be restricted to naturalistic causes rather than logical causes?
7 How did multi-cellular life originate? How did cells adapted to individual survival ‘learn’ to cooperate and specialize (including undergoing programmed cell death) to create complex plants and animals?
8 How did sex originate? Asexual reproduction gives up to twice as much reproductive success (‘fitness’) for the same resources as sexual reproduction, so how could the latter ever gain enough advantage to be selected? And how could mere physics and chemistry invent the complementary apparatuses needed at the same time (non-intelligent processes cannot plan for future coordination of male and female organs).
9 Why are the (expected) countless millions of transitional fossils missing? Darwin noted the problem and it still remains. The evolutionary family trees in textbooks are based on imagination, not fossil evidence. Famous Harvard paleontologist (and evolutionist), Stephen Jay Gould, wrote, “The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record persists as the trade secret of paleontology”. Other evolutionist fossil experts also acknowledge the problem.
10 How do ‘living fossils’ remain unchanged over supposed hundreds of millions of years, if evolution has changed worms into humans in the same time frame? Professor Gould wrote, “the maintenance of stability within species must be considered as a major evolutionary problem.”
11 How did blind chemistry create mind/ intelligence, meaning, altruism and morality? If everything evolved, and we invented God, as per evolutionary teaching, what purpose or meaning is there to human life? Should students be learning nihilism (life is meaningless) in science classes?
12 Why is evolutionary ‘just-so’ story-telling tolerated? Evolutionists often use flexible story-telling to ‘explain’ observations contrary to evolutionary theory. NAS(USA) member Dr Philip Skell wrote, “Darwinian explanations for such things are often too supple: Natural selection makes humans self-centered and aggressive—except when it makes them altruistic and peaceable. Or natural selection produces virile men who eagerly spread their seed—except when it prefers men who are faithful protectors and providers. When an explanation is so supple that it can explain any behavior, it is difficult to test it experimentally, much less use it as a catalyst for scientific discovery.”
13 Where are the scientific breakthroughs due to evolution? Dr Marc Kirschner, chair of the Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, stated: “In fact, over the last 100 years, almost all of biology has proceeded independent of evolution, except evolutionary biology itself. Molecular biology, biochemistry, physiology, have not taken evolution into account at all.”
Dr Skell wrote, “It is our knowledge of how these organisms actually operate, not speculations about how they may have arisen millions of years ago, that is essential to doctors, veterinarians, farmers … .” Evolution actually hinders medical discovery. Then why do schools and universities teach evolution so dogmatically, stealing time from experimental biology that so benefits humankind?
14 Science involves experimenting to figure out how things work; how they operate. Why is evolution, a theory about history, taught as if it is the same as this operational science? You cannot do experiments, or even observe what happened, in the past. Asked if evolution has been observed, Richard Dawkins said, “Evolution has been observed. It’s just that it hasn’t been observed while it’s happening.”
(Richard Dawkins didn't explain why evolution is not observed while it is happening. This is because his belief in evolution "magic" has occurred over millions of years. This is his explanation for evolution...millions of years. Evolution can't be explained in operational science terms. Atheists must always include the "magic" mix of millions of years) Researcher Bill Range
15 Why is a fundamentally religious idea, a dogmatic belief system that fails to explain the evidence, taught in science classes? Karl Popper, famous philosopher of science, said “Darwinism is not a testable scientific theory, but a metaphysical [religious] research programme ….” Michael Ruse, evolutionist science philosopher admitted, “Evolution is a religion. This was true of evolution in the beginning, and it is true of evolution still today.” If “you can’t teach religion in science classes”, why is evolution taught?
Evolution is a false religion that is taught in schools as "science". The "magic" of millions of years and millions of accidental "natural selections" or goo-to-you evolution is held out as an explantion of creation.
Evolution theories leave that part up to you to figure out with your imagination via the millions of years timeline.
Evolution theories always add the "magic mix" millions of years idea to the explanation of Creation.
Why cling to an empty evolution theory that is not scientific and explains your origin only through the millions of years timeline?
Researcher Bill Range
Intellectual nonsense does not suddenly become factual because it is uttered by a famous savant. Jane Hawking was for a quarter century the wife of Stephen Hawking. Her first book, Music to Move the Stars, McMillan, New York, was printed in 2004 but is no longer in print, reveals much about the atheist Stephen Hawking and his atheistic "faith" masquerading as science. The closed mind of a dogmatic atheist is what the book is about. Jane’s belief in God as creator of the universe vs Stephen’s atheistic faith.
Jane summarized her concept of much of the research, of which her husband was in the forefront, as ‘theorizing on abstruse suppositions about imaginary particulars traveling in imaginary time in a looking-glass universe which did not exist except in the mind of the theorists.’
Evolution has nothing whatsoever to do with science. Belief in evolution has to do with a humanist religious viewpoint (Humanism is the religion of all who have chosen to believe man rather than God). Johanson not only (deceptively) used bones scattered over a mile apart, he presented an argument he should know to be false. As an anthropologist Johanson should be fully aware that a large hip joint does not prove upright posture, much less does it prove higher intelligence or the ability to sire a human. Many competent anthropologists have carefully examined these and other "Australopithicine" remains and concluded "Lucy" could not walk upright! The fossil hip bone found was an ape's. "Lucy" face bones were crushed. The ape's face is pictured as a female but it is not known if the ape was male or female. "Lucy" had an evolutionist "makeover" that portrays the ape as a female.
Evolutionists/atheists have "doctored" "Lucy" the ape in pictures and books as the "Missing link" The real "missing link" is evidence that the fossil bones called "Lucy" was anything other than an ape!
"Lucy" was no "missing link" just an ape that had a "makeover" (Lucy she's no lady) (Dr David Menton excellent video)
Starlight And The Age Of The Universe
Young Blue Stars Found In Milky Way
Psalm 19:1-3 19:1 The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth his handywork. 19:2 Day unto day uttereth speech, and night unto night sheweth knowledge. 19:3 There is no speech nor language, where their voice is not heard.
Genesis 1:1, "In the beginning (time), God created the heavens (space) and the earth (matter)."
John 3:16 "For God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son, that whosoever believeth in Him should not perish, but have everlasting life."
We all see the evidence of God's creation. How we interpret what we see helps us make sense of this present world. The Bible, the “history book of the universe”, provides a reliable, eye-witness account of the beginning of all things. When properly understood, the “evidence” confirms the biblical account. The universe is "fined tuned" for life, ie designed by a designer, creator, The Lord GOD Almighty.
Creation Talk episodes are produced by FineTunedUniverse.com researcher Bill Rains.